








(4)
Your rating: Now say why...





(22)


| Downloads:55,351 |
| Version Downloads:4,782 |
| Type:Business : Word Processing |
| License:Commercial |
| Date:05 Nov 2010 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price: $129.99 |
Overall (Version 12.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
-2
N9yty reviewed on 04 Apr 2012
At any rate, the output PDF format Text-Image is broken. It only includes text on the output page, no images anywhere. I contact support and was told "Use Image-Text". Um, NO! That isn't what I want, so their answer to a broken product is "Don't use that feature". Unbelievable!!
Of course, no refund available. How stupid can you get. PERHAPS I can get an update to fix this some months down the road, but what a waste of money.
+106
I would dispute their opening text, "Readiris Pro is the most powerful and accurate OCR software for Mac OS X. It accurately and rapidly transforms your paper documents,"
Once upon a time there was no choice of realistic competition, I was stuck with Readiris.
That's not the case anymore.
+4
IloveBurma reviewed on 12 Jan 2012
+6
+19
They are obsessed with piracy and won't offer potential paying customers try before buy because of pirates. Who wants to pirate business software anyway! The kids have no interest in scanning in homework assignments. Come on.
So I will not buy it as I cannot try it out on MY AND I SAID MY documents. I am not paying then finding out it works bad on my workflow.
Stupid people how do you think that solves piracy? All your doing is annoying business people like me. I am not taking your silly web site trial to my boss. I need to show it works before we commit! I am not also wasting time contacting you to do this when others are in the evaluation stage without contacting them. One of them will get the sale not you. Fix it!
Good app destroyed by a silly trial concept. Pirating OCR software talk about paranoia.
+1
-76
Guess I'll just go with the competition.
+20
Again, I "suckered" a store to install this.
The Good:
Installed quickly and easily.
Didn't crash on the couple of pages I gave it (but didn't send it enough to test it, as it used to guarantee crash with 3 pages or more.
The interface is a little better than it used to be.
The Bad:
Accuracy is horrible (still), but a little better than v11.
The interface is clumsy and difficult to use if you need to alter anything... If you do everything automatically, it's good.
There is no learning for CJK languages... and out of about 800 characters on the first page, there were more than 150 significant errors. It mis-recognized OBVIOUS and simple (less than 8 stroke) characters, would blow punctuation constantly (there are about 30 different "parenthesis" types, it seemed to only recognize 5, and blew the rest, changing them to ").") Full-width and half-width spaces vanished. On a list where there were duplicate lines with just a number change at the end of the line, it would not recognize each line differently, even though it's a clean and well-defined scan with 0° rotation, and monochrome.
One thing it needs to be aware of, that it definitely doesn't, is that most Kanji is fixed-pitched... a space, exclamation point, em-dash, all characters, take up the same width... if it scans this way, you need to choose those full-width characters - not splitting multi-shape glyphs or using proportional Roman text, and if half-width characters are in the mix, it needs to generate those. It didn't do any of this.
While working for a printing company, I had access to a Win95 program called KanjiOCR, it barely ever missed a single character, got spacing correct, and was TINY. It only missed things that were smudged or mis-shaped (scratches, damaged printing plate, etc.) The only issue with that software is that it didn't use Unicode. Why, over 10 years, when tech has advanced (scanners, systems, and pattern recognition), a program that's 12 years old works better than one that's a year old, blows my mind.
It seems that, at least the Roman section of this works much better than it used to. Don't even bother wasting the enormous amount of cash on the Asian option, as you will still have to be HAND-ENTERING a very large amount of Kanji, just to correct it's errors and formatting.
Better yet, try ABBYY, and the unix OCR based free tools still seem to hold up well against the basic version of this software.
I'll try this again with version 13, on the assumption I still haven't found a good Mac Kanji OCR. But, since the Mac software section is vanishing from the only two computer stores in the area, and the Kanji versions don't have a trial version, that probably won't happen.
+20
+40
Omnipage (Windows-only unf.) is vastly superior for Asian language; I run Virtualbox specifically to run Omnipage for Japanese OCR.
+2
+13
Brookhaven reviewed on 31 Mar 2011
Notwithstanding my other comments I might have been interested in upgrading but I just don't trust the company.
John F reviewed on 27 Mar 2011
+3
+3
The good news is that I have found a workaround that is perfectly suited to my own needs. (I probably ocr 100 pages or so per year, using a Mac G-5.)
Check out http://onlineocr.net
One signs up (this gives you 10 free trials), browse your computer for the image(s) (a wide range of formats is acceptable, including Mac archiv) and upload them. The process has been exceptionally speedy for me, and the returned docs are flawless and can be read in Word (among others)
Having used up my 10 trials, I had to BUY more ocrs. $5.95/100 was ok for me.
I may get some free ocr's for writing this, but that is NOT my primary reason, which is a desire to stick it to Iris in any way I can.
Good luck and let me know what you experience!
Bob
+5
+44
On their website there is a download section pretending there's a "demo". You have to give your email address and might expect that you receive a download link. But all you get via mail are two flash DEMOS (already present on the site) and repeating mails of - so called - special offers.
I can't take a company using these methods for serious.
+3
+13
Not a good sign I feel.
v11 is prone to crashing on SL on my MacPro so I did wonder about upgrading.
One limitation I found with v11 was that the number of pages in a document that can be ocr'd are limited unless you get the corporate version, which is a bit sneaky.