








(9)
Your rating: Now say why...





(11)


| Downloads:44,385 |
| Version Downloads:400 |
| Type:Education : Mathematics |
| License:Demo |
| Date:27 Mar 2012 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price: $2,100.00 |
Overall (Version 7.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
J_michael_pinc reviewed on 02 Mar 2012
I haven't used it professionally, but I would suspect it measures up quite nicely to MatLab in that respect as well, and it has enough similarities that making a transition to MatLab would be quick and painless.
melager reviewed on 04 Oct 2011
+2
+8
Karenbindash reviewed on 23 Oct 2010
A professional user could easily need to spend $15,000 to get all the toolboxes they need. Often one toolbox requires several others to be installed too. The price rockets up.
The symbolic toolbox for MATLAB, adds symbolic capabilities, but it is clear this was not developed initially for MATLAB, but was sold as another product, and the company than acquired by Mathworks. It does not feel very nicely integrated into MATLAB, and although I have access to it, I soon gave up and use Mathematica when I want symbolic maths, as Mathematica is much stronger at symbolics.
For numerical work, this is an industry standard and well worth learning to use well. But there are alternatives someone should consider
1) Octave is a free Clone. It is not 100% MATLAB compatible, but is quite close. However, from a students point of view, I'd rather learn MATLAB as that's what employers want.
But if money is tight, Octave is a very viable alternative.
2) Sage - open source, and free, but too buggy. I would not trust any result from Sage.
3) Mathematica - more expensive, but more complete, but not as easy to use as MATLAB. There is a "home edition" of this too, which is excellent value for money if you want it for hobby use.
4) Maple - Like Mathematica, this is better at symbolics than MATLAB with the symbolic maths toolbox. But I feel Mathematica is better than Maple, so I don't really consider Maple worth bothering with.
5) R - for statistics this can't be beaten, and is free too.
+1
+29
+3
-34
Other people have to fill a detailed request. Then they are told that "A MathWorks representative will contact you to discuss your needs and provide access to trial software."
I know what I need : a free demo not a discussant about my needs !
+3
+303
Xplicit reviewed on 07 Mar 2009
+1
+53
taoeffect reviewed on 06 Mar 2009
Its language is very easy to work with, well designed. People with limited programming experience should be able to pick it up easily.
The built-in documentation is top class as well. I've compared it with Mathematica's documentation, and it blows it away. It's easy to search, comprehensive, and the examples work.
Matlab makes it painfully easy to manipulate and visualize data, and run various experiments. Its full capabilities are rarely tapped, as it can even integrate with various other languages. If you're looking for a product that makes it easy to do hard things, look no further.
+3
gregwelch reviewed on 09 Oct 2008
"Value" (rating) is hard for me to judge because my university has a site license.
While there are things to complain about, I for one am very pleased to have it on the Mac, and working quite well (albeit a little clunkily) for my needs.
+201
+22
MBHockey reviewed on 01 Mar 2007