








(4)
Your rating: Now say why...
Corrects the remaining bugs that have been reported to me since the p3 who was almost stable. Some crashes are possible with corrupted images files. Here is some of them:
Corrects the remaining bugs that have been reported to me since the p3 who was almost stable. Some crashes are possible with corrupted images files. Here is some of them:





(8)


| Downloads:12,793 |
| Version Downloads:3,214 |
| Type:Utilities : Contextual Menus |
| License:Free |
| Date:19 Nov 2006 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price:Free |
Overall (Version 2.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
-1
+437
Corpsecorps reviewed on 21 Feb 2007
Oops.
I spoke too soon after reading the 'ReadMe' file when i wrote my previous review.
Now that i've had a chance to use more of the functions longer, and attempted to make heavier use of PPP, i had to knock some stars off here and there.
Some things don't work quite as described. Some don't always function at all, or else some strange behaviors need to be explained in documentation. Several tend to cause Finder to *CRASH*!
On the site it says this is the final release for version 2, but it needs some serious work.
+1
+28
+437
2.0f seems to have fixed some of the instability.
The thing just doesn't do anything very useful while the non-OS X widgets and the ways they work aren't intuitive at all.
.
+229
Your "Aaargh!" complaint about PPP being an unsuitable replacement for QuickImage is downright bizarre, it seems you believe setnaN is somehow responsible for providing you with a QuickImage replacement for free. As if the "Aaargh!" wasn't enough, posted another review to SHOUT YOUR OUTRAGE AT PPP FALLING SHORT OF THE ALMIGHTY QUICKIMAGE. Ok, we got the point, but you're outrage was still boiling over, because you had to correct your second review. Was it to apologize for being so rude? No, it was to downgrade your two star rating to a one star rating! For FREEWARE!
I've seen some rude reviews over the years here at MU, but yours is one for the history books.
+437
Corpsecorps reviewed on 20 Feb 2007
Well, having had some time to use it, and get used to it, i can say that it's not too awful, but that i was right the first time around.
THIS IS NOT EVEN CLOSE TO BEING A SUBSTITUTE FOR QuickImage!
PPP is non-intuitive, to put it mildly. The small, grey, incomprehensible toolbar is awful. After wasting time clicking on things for the past couple weeks, trying to find something useful here, i finally took time out of my busy schedule to read the documentation, if it can be called that. Didn't help.
I can't figure out what functionality the positive reviews are talking about. It doesn't do much of use other than let you view images and some basic info about them. The rest is fluff.
I'm a heavy mouse user and a lot isn't available without keyboard shortcuts.
The UI has some good things going for it, but i'm always switching to something huge like Photoshop or GraphicConverter to do simple little edits which it would be great to have right in PPP, like those found in QuickImage.
It is, at least, fast, though that may just be the new computer. Can't compare since QuickImage won't work on Mac Pro.
Price is right, especially because it doesn't do much.
+437
Something useful for those with babies?
Try a dictionary!
+437
-----------------------
CYBERATOMIC Thank You!
This is so awesome. I was so used to QuickImageCM and without it working on an Intel machine, sucked...
But now PicturePopProCM has come into my life and I am so very happy!
The functionality of this little app is excellent -- this is how the finder SHOULD BE!
-----------------------
I too used that software heavily, and this is NOTHING like it, as it had many editing functions.
There were almost 2 months between my first and second comment during which i searched in vain for something like QuickImageCM and i had come across additional mentions of this. I didn't remember it well by then and after trying it again, i decided to give it a real review.
As for the third review knocking off a star as compared to the previous one, i clearly explained that after more extensive use of more of the features, i found it to be more poorly designed and unstable than i had previously given it credit for.
Not sure why you're griping about it now anyway. The thing hasn't been updated since that time.
+437
Aaargh!
Where's the real replacement for the indespensible QuickImage?!
+61
Andrew Scott reviewed on 24 Aug 2006
The only problem with it is its interface. It makes use of what a first seems like a welter of icons. The novice user will spend quite some time learning what they mean, along with their keyboard shortcuts, using only a fraction of the features, or giving up altogether. Those who persevere may find its power and flexibility indispensable (I haven't had it long enough to judge yet).
The interface desperately needs to adhere to OS X interface standards, such as the close box position and style, and would be aided tremendously by the addition of tool tips for all icons. A pop-up palette of shortcuts and would also be helpful.
A small point: the developer makes use of the term "diaporama" to refer to, I think, slideshow functionality. I can't find this in my dictionary so perhaps it's a technical term or a translation mistake but I suggest "slideshow" would be clearer to most English readers.
Altogether a useful and powerful addition to the Mac OS but on need to some polish.
+9
Twilightscapes reviewed on 24 Aug 2006
This is so awesome. I was so used to QuickImageCM and without it working on an Intel machine, sucked...
But now PicturePopProCM has come into my life and I am so very happy!
The functionality of this little app is excellent -- this is how the finder SHOULD BE!
+31
+9
I use to use QuickImage CM and it rocked. However it is not Intel-friendly.
Anonymous reviewed on 31 Jul 2005
Anonymous reviewed on 05 May 2005
In spite of his version number (i don't consider version numbering as promotion system but state of evolution of software), PicturePopPro is now 3 years old. Initially i was thinking that the final release will be a shareware and put a date limitation for some other reasons too, but since one year i was thinking about release the final as freeware... and now since few month,.. i'm sure, it will be freeware/donationware, without limitations of time or use, nor boring remainders, like all my other public softwares. You can find some french forum where i'm talking about this. So, in conclusion, if people want to test a old, slow, but stable version, try 1.0b10. If adventurers people want to test PicturePopPro current beta that is really faster, more evolved, check the website, but please consult the read me, don't report bug until i ask and keep cool with problems ! :-)
merci beaucoup :) setnan
+148
There is nothing inherently wrong about this but in my opinion, if this is what the developers are doing they should be "up front" about it, by letting people know and what they should eventually have to pay. That is what is fair and the right thing to do. Additionally people who use it in this manner and expose themselves to the risk of problems, should be compensated by being offered the final product at substantial discount. After all, they are "working" for the developer by beta testing the product. Again, if they knew this up front they might be encouraged to register in order to take advantage of such an offer.
"Bait and Switch" sales tactics really irritate me because when it happens I feel intentionally deceived by the person that did it. It strikes me as a variation of embezzlement.
Therefore I am choosing for myself, not to use this product, at least anymore until the developers clarify their position on this subject.
I seem to be speaking through your words.
Thanks for your comment!!