








(4)
Your rating: Now say why...





| Downloads:13,199 |
| Version Downloads:2,761 |
| Type:Development : Java |
| License:Free |
| Date:07 Jul 2010 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price:Free |
Overall (Version 6.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+1
+8
+21
+480
+17
-1
I have not succeeded in doing this, mostly due to the lack of a suitable build, but such a build could likely be done.
+3
+17
Daniel-Alex-Finkelstein reviewed on 07 Jul 2010
NetBeans supports binary instrumentation for performance analysis on Solaris and Linux platforms, but not Mac OS X. If such instrumentation is required on Mac OS X, the free XCode is available from Apple on the developer web site with optional performance analysis tools selected.
NetBeans and Eclipse appear to be just as fast, or slow depending on your perception, at runtime and both support global and per-project configurations of the compilers, environment, etc. NetBeans doesn't have header template support like Eclipse (where new files will have custom comments or pragmas defined to indicate the name of the developer, date of modification, etc., though those can be implemented with version control keywords, which NetBeans supports).
I've had Eclipse crash often when attempting to create new makefile projects or new projects altogether, whereas NetBeans doesn't suffer the same fate. Overall, NetBeans seems more stable.
+6
one78man reviewed on 27 May 2009
+1
+15
wfm reviewed on 28 Nov 2008
So much nicer to use than Eclipse based IDEs.
+1
+1
Gaoshan reviewed on 27 Nov 2008
-7