








(3)
Your rating: Now say why...





| Downloads:13,707 |
| Version Downloads:3,830 |
| Type:Development : Editors |
| License:Free |
| Date:25 Jun 2009 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price:Free |
Overall (Version 3.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
-2
-15
Clarusad reviewed on 02 Jan 2010
-1
-1
This application requires Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) or greater.
So no Eclipse for us Tiger users then? Or would older version help and are they compatible with newer versions?
Anonymous reviewed on 06 Oct 2005
There is a need to come out with a simple and systematical trouble-shooting to isolate the cause of failure in activation for newbie in Java development.
In addition, solving bugs in Eclipse for Mac OS X is relative slow as compared to other platform.
In short, I would suggest to wait for more stable version in due course. In the mean time, I have preference for JBuilder 2005.
+76
Schmelding reviewed on 16 Jun 2005
1. Not native Mac Cocoa app
2. The CVS doesn't handle special Mac characters like, ñ, é, -, etc.
3. The interface is clumsy and not intuitive, though once you get the hang of it, it is manageable.
+11
2. CVS does handle special Mac characters (but you have to understand how CVS works). If a CVS running on local Mac is used, you'll have to set the CVS encoding for filenames to UTF-8 (use properties dialog on CVS connection). For the file content, CVS makes no assumptions about the encoding. So if you are using a CVS on a different platform, you'll have to tell Eclipse on Mac what the encoding of files in CVS is.
3. Please file bugs!
+1
Anonymous reviewed on 05 Oct 2003
1. The editor sucks
a. no drag & drop editing
b. totally un-Mac-like text selection behavior
2. Can't debug JSP directly, a la NetBeans
If there were plugins available that would allow you to use BBedit, or even WASTE, as the editor and NetBeans to debug JSPs, this could be the perfect IDE!
Anonymous reviewed on 10 Sep 2003
(One note: I feel a bit worried about the circumstance that's just working on 10.2 and above ...)