








(4)
Your rating: Now say why...




| Downloads:89,697 |
| Version Downloads:2,076 |
| Type:Utilities : Compression |
| License:Shareware |
| Date:19 Mar 2012 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price: $29.00 |
Overall (Version 4.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+35
bluehour73 reviewed on 28 Mar 2012
I can see how it may not appeal to the facebook generation though....
-2
hous reviewed on 20 Mar 2012
http://www.macstarfish.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/rarme.html
(RarMe 0.2 is developed for use on OS X 10.3, but works fine on 10.2. It just won't look as pretty)
???
+1
-27
Gn-0000 reviewed on 22 Jul 2011
It takes 5 hours to complete the job of compressing 50GB iso files into multi-segmented far files!
it actually does not stick to our era!
+1
+27
Antoinesynopsis reviewed on 10 May 2011
-5
+25
+3
+100
+1
+312
Unrar is RAR, in that, it's the same exact program, from the same exact developer, using the same exact algorithm, except it does not have the functionality of actually making rar files, just decompressing them. And that's why it's free. It gives the entire public the ability to decompress proprietary rar files at no added charge (exact same deal with Stuffit).
That's why both spit out the same CP notice ("unrar -h", "rar -h"): Copyright (c) 1993-2009 Alexander Roshal
+8
+12
If they want to charge MAC users the same money as Windows users they should give MAC users the same product, not some outdated basic version over and over again.
Lets face it, WinRAR / RAR is not exactly a top-end piece of software with major complexities in developing and supplying a GUI front-end for MAC users, it seems the developers are plain lazy and cannot be bothered to give their users / customers what they want.
+2
+6
http://stuffforlife.blogspot.com/2009/03/data-compression-in-mac-os-x-how-to.html
Hope this is useful.
-9
-30
It's 2008 , CLI based tools is not only wrong it's and insult to every Mac user.
Like most Mac users we left the Windows side to get away from the stupid command line garbage because the Mac OS was using a GUI front end for everything instead, saved time and increased productivity.
Terminal junkies need a reality check , you want CLI , then buy a UNIX or PC box. I don't want CLI period.
30 bucks for an inconvienent method , you couldn't me double that to even waste a single keystroke to use it!
Ha ha ha
+29
the RAR compression is supposed to be pretty much state of the art/ tighter than other archive compression schemes. So there is some value in itself.
But I agree that it seems Nuts for Mac users to have to pay the same $29 that a Windows user pays who gets both Command line and a nice GUI window interface (think similar to winzip).
Seems to me that Mac users should either pay less for getting Command line only, or should be getting the same bundle of CLI plus GUI.
As it is now, you still have to buy another package which then calls the RAR CLI, if you want to get it all done from the Mac GUI (which would be my preference).
Would be nice if the RAR folks, or one of our clever Mac wizard developers, could put together a Friendly user interface with RAR compression and at a total packaged reasonable price.
+32
7-zip offers very competitive compression in comparison with RAR and is entirely free. If you want a nice, full-featured compression program for OS X you can get BetterZip (not free), which can compress to a variety of formats including 7-zip and RAR (RAR licence must be purchased separately).
+1
+102
You better of buying BetterZip which altough by default can't create a RAR archive (have to buy a RAR license), can do a lot more and priced less
+312
+2
+201
Macports, Porticus and unrar obtained this way are all free.
+312
+8
+6
xypher reviewed on 30 May 2008
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/12598
Simply place the Rar and Unrar files into the resources folder.
+2
Sebnix rated on 19 Mar 2012
+47
Werty rated on 17 Jan 2012