








(3)
Your rating: Now say why...





(13)


| Downloads:17,287 |
| Version Downloads:1,291 |
| Type:Development : HTML |
| License:Shareware |
| Date:04 Feb 2010 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price: $29.95 |
Overall (Version 5.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+2
+38
Longtime users are supposed to pay an upgrade price of $19.95 for this, er, bugfix...
Being still PPC and thus not dependent on Snow Leopard, I guess I'll skip this one and wait for a MAJOR OVERHAUL of this dated, yet still very functional app. If any...
+3
+10
eyeless reviewed on 29 Aug 2008
+2
+38
LouKash reviewed on 22 Dec 2006
I've done my whole site with PageSpinner: www.loukash.com
(with some exceptions like the blog or the shop though...)
What it desperately needs is a site manager. It used to have a bad one in the OS 9 days, now there's none. I've used to use PageMill's site manager in Classic but PageMill doesn't work reliable anymore on Macs that can't boot from OS 9... (and there's no Classic on Intel...)
+1
+138
+1
+19
My real comment is this; I don't think it's right to announce the release of a beta version via VT, and then expect registered users (which I am) to sign up to *possibly* be selected as one of the "small number of testers" once they click through to download. Very misleading in my opinion.
I am a firm believer that VT should be used to announce *publicly* available software (even if it's beta), NOT as a place to garner a beta-test user-base for a developer's own purposes.
My $.02
+2
If you're brand new to writing HTML, the sample files and tutorials in PageSpinner will quickly have you on your way without forcing you to figure out how to do Tables, JavaScript or other advanced features.
The only thing missing from PageSpinner is a built in spell checker.
Jamie
Anonymous reviewed on 06 Jun 2005
Also have to agree with others that it badly needs a UI make-over.
Anonymous reviewed on 24 May 2005
but damn would i like to see it have a make over,
it looks and feels just soo classic.
take the lack of contextual menu's for example, or the so damn ugly and (to me) useless icons used in the gui.
Anonymous reviewed on 19 May 2005
Still no support for contextual menus when control/right-clicking selected text.
Are you really developing website with a one button mouse? I thought we'd come out of the stone age... It's 2005, right?
Except for this the program seems very nice.
Anonymous reviewed on 19 May 2005
+2
+11
Btw, some real improvements to the interface would be kind of a good idea..
+2
Beekicker rated on 05 Feb 2012