








(11)
Your rating: Now say why...





(34)


| Downloads:38,249 |
| Version Downloads:3,084 |
| Type:Development : HTML |
| License:Updater |
| Date:15 Jun 2011 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price: $399.00 |
Overall (Version 11.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
-42
Egami reviewed on 29 Oct 2011
With the $400 that DW costs, you can buy yourself Expresso 2, Transmit 4, MAMP Pro, VMWare Fusion and a Home Edition of Windows 7 (to test your sites in IE) and you would still have some money to buy a couple of books on HTML/CSS/JS. That's far more value than DW will ever give.
+1
-4
bayz reviewed on 04 Jul 2011
"Update is not applicable"
Oh well Coda's much better anyways.
+1
-68
+2
+8
Pwareham reviewed on 16 Jun 2011
There are so many superior alternatives to this outdated app, I'm surprised anyone is still using it. WYSIWYG building of websites was always a pipe dream that one that basically fell apart at least 8 years ago - now more than ever you really need to hand code to be a web designer. And DW is rubbish as a text editor - the FTP is also lousy and unstable.
Just use Panic Coda.
+3
+115
+3
+17
I can think of so many better workflows than using this.
$400 :)
+1
+26
+1
+17
I find it out of touch, bloated and hopelessly lost as an application for serious commercial developers who are on a deadline using OSX/Unix platforms.
I stick to my guns there are better workflows that do not requite DW in them.
+1
+132
+17
Macromedia was such a fail to buy them at the price they paid. That money would have been BETTER SPENT putting it into in house technology. By now Macromedia alone would be worth half what they paid and the products Adobe killed overtaken them making Adobe worth double.
The rise of Apple HTML5/CSS3/javascript frameworks etc would have nailed Macromedia stock price right down.
Of course I have hindsight....
+132
As an example, look at the truly awful templates that come with DW, and then look at the examples that came with GL. GL was a lot more flexible with layouts, and you could be very creative. It was like a page layout program. DW is clunky and you are forced to either use tables or CSS, and CSS was never meant to be used for graphic elements. Most of the sites done with CSS all look the same... boring! DW isn't too bad once you have set up a nice template, and the GUI is getting more Adobe like. But I wish they would bring some of the cool features that GL had into DW. It was really far more advanced IMHO.
+93
-1
+76
Beige reviewed on 27 Feb 2011
+279
Cowicide reviewed on 14 Feb 2011
But this still is crap. I was able to crash the !@#$% app by simply starting it up and then daring to right-click on the on the site folder too soon I guess. Completely froze up DW and had to force quit the thing. Seriously, Adobe? I couldn't even right-click my site folder?
Sigh....
+1
+25
Philipwheelock reviewed on 11 Feb 2011
-3
-141
mhd.msw rated on 10 Dec 2011
+37
Twisted rated on 03 Sep 2011
+132
Davidravenmoon rated on 15 Jun 2011
-42
Egami rated on 08 Apr 2011